China’s RRR Cut: What does it achieve?

A man is riding a tricycle with heavy load on the streets of Shanghai - by Jakub Hałun

A man is riding a tricycle with heavy load on the streets of Shanghai – by Jakub Hałun

Paul Gambles, Managing Director

On Sunday China’s central bank, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) reduced its reserve-requirement ratio (RRR) by a huge 1% (or 100 base points), a record-equalling cut.

RRR is the percentage of depositors’ balances a bank must retain in cash – the rate is usually set by the central bank. The reduction of this amount is an easing tool, designed to encourage banks to lend more and reduce interest rates.[1]

Click here for the PDF version

The PBOC’s action comes just days after an official announcement that in Q1 2015, Chinese economic growth was the slowest in six years.[2] Chinese officials expressed concern that areas such as industrial output and retail sales caused concern.[3]

The PBOC had previously implemented steps to stimulate lending, such as the medium-term lending facility. Despite its name, this is a short-term credit programme which made RMB 370 billion (USD 59.6 bn) available in Q1 2015, according to the central bank.[4]

A desperate measure

The new RRR of 18.5% may still be high by global standards[5] but the fact that this is the second cut in just 2 ½ months and the joint biggest ever single reduction (the other was in 2008) smacks of desperation. The move is designed to release RMB 1.2 trillion (USD 194 bn) of liquidity,[6] in order to halt the economic slowdown. While official figures put economic growth at the targeted 7% level, I have my doubts that it was really that high.

The reality is that the Chinese economy is weak and the equity markets are strong; although comparing the volume of shares traded on the Shanghai Composite to that on the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index shows that most of the recent trading in Chinese companies’ equity is being done in Hong Kong.

 ScreenHunter_757 Jun. 03 10.06

This emphasizes the scale of gross and net outflows, now that exports have dried up.[7]

The fact is that China is currently dealing with many economic issues. It has bloated housing and construction sectors and are consequently suffering.[8] Not only that, it is facing a private debt time-bomb, similar in scale to that seen in the US sub-prime market in 2007.

 ScreenHunter_758 Jun. 03 10.08

Of course, the main difference between the two scenarios is that the US government was guilty of dereliction of duty in 2007. Today the Chinese government is actually the main cheerleader of private debt[9] – especially since it moved the sector itself as a developer to support the market – and playmaker.

With that in mind, my view is that more liquidity is not what is needed – all that will do is simply shore up debt and mal-investment problems. Contacts in Hong Kong tell me they believe that the Chinese money flowing into Hong Kong-listed stocks right now[10] is a sign of distrust in the government and the mainland’s financial institutions.

 

The effects on the Chinese economy

It´ll be interesting to see how people will react to the PBOC’s RRR announcement. Will people find a workaround? Will this redress the lack of confidence? I don’t think so: once the exuberance dies down, I think it will undermine the economy further.

Will this cure China’s underlying debt problems? Not in my view. In fact, I think it will make them worse. As for helping the economy as a whole: I think the restriction change will ultimately stifle it.

One effect the change may have is to boost the property market; however this may be in the very short term, putting air into a bubble that is trying to deflate. With that comes the risk of bursting that bubble.

Even though on Monday – the first full trading day since the announcement – saw falls in the Shanghai composite and the Hang Seng,[11] I do think the RRR change will boost stock prices in mainland China. However, Hong Kong will probably trade most of this – thus defeating the aim of stemming capital outflows. Should Hong Kong prices go up in the short run, it would mean the PBOC will have to pull another rabbit out of the hat to avoid a fall-back.

In essence, the PBOC is using the wrong tool for the wrong job. It has tried to address this by cutting the RRR by 200 base points for rural credit co-operatives and 300 base points for the China Agricultural Development Bank.

Any way I look at these RRR cuts, they strike me as desperate moves and I said as much when I appeared on CNBC on Monday morning.[12] Not only that, the PBOC is replicating the flawed policies of pushing on a string, implemented by Western governments in 2008. Those policies have left many countries facing a deflation crisis, worryingly similar to that experienced by Japan over the last quarter century.

For further information contact us by e-mail on info@mbmg-investment.com or call +66 2 665 2536.

Disclaimers:  

  1. While every effort has been made to ensure that the information contained herein is correct, MBMG Investment Advisory cannot be held responsible for any errors that may occur. The views of the contributors may not necessarily reflect the house view of MBMG Investment Advisory. Views and opinions expressed herein may change with market conditions and should not be used in isolation.
  2. With investment comes risks. Please study all relevant information carefully before making any investment decision.
  3. An investment is not a deposit, it carries investment risk. Investors are encouraged to make an investment only when investing in such an asset corresponds with their own objectives and only after they have acknowledge all risks and have been informed that the return may be more or less than the initial sum.

[1] http://www.frbsf.org/education/publications/doctor-econ/2001/august/reserve-requirements-ratio

[2] http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/04/15/us-china-economy-gdp-idUSKBN0N52E220150415

[3] Xinhua news agency

[4] http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-04-19/china-follows-on-stimulus-pledge-with-bank-reserve-ratio-cut

[5] idem

[6] idem

[7] idem

[8] http://www.dw.de/chinas-real-estate-market-weighed-down-by-oversupply/a-18207416

[9] http://www.ideaeconomics.org/blog/2015/1/13/steve-keens-2015-outlook

[10] http://www.ft.com/intl/fastft/306563/hk-shares-7.5-yr-high-mainland-chinese-buy

[11] http://www.reuters.com/finance/markets/asia

[12] http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000372342

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: